Legal Opinion

ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. U.S.A. LAMP AND BALLAST RECYCLING, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00609Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ESTES EXPRESS LINES, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-00609 v. Hon. William S. Stickman IV U.S.A LAMP AND BALLAST RECYCLING, INC. D/B/A CLEANLITES RECYCLING, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV, United States District Judge Almost two years ago, Plaintiff Estes Express Lines (“Estes”) served its initial disclosures upon Defendant U.S.A. Lamp and Ballast Recycling Inc., d/b/a Cleanlites Recycling Inc.’s (“Cleanlites”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) (“Rule 26”). Estes’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Sherlyn Konstantopoulos and Dimos Konstantopoulos v. Westvaco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API