Legal Opinion

John C. Van Houten v. Ray Arthur Ralls and Gerald L. Byington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1969No. 22356_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

John C. Van Houten commenced a suit against the United States and two employees of the federal Government in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. He sought to recover damages for injuries sustained when an automobile in which he was riding as a passenger collided with another vehicle due to the alleged negligence of both drivers. Both drivers, Ray Arthur Ralls and Gerald L. Bying-ton, and Van Houten himself, were employees of the United States acting within the scope of their employment at the time of the accident. Insofar as the United States was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sammy J. Vantrease v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  2. Anthony F. Noga, Special Administrator of the Estate of Peter Anthony Noga, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Margaret M. Gilliam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Janet H. McHugh v. University of Vermont Christopher Wheeler James P. Alexander and United States of America (u.s. Army), Christopher WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Walter Lojuk v. Marjorie Quandt, Director of the Veterans Administration HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Mary Eileen Meeker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  4. Helen D. Kelley and John E. Kelley v. United States of America, Ruth SemkoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Richard Thomas Carr and Doreen Carr v. United States of America, William Granville Reynolds, Sr., and Joseph B. BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API