United States v. Mittel-Carey
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692, 704-05, 101 S.Ct. 2587, 69 L.Ed.2d 340 (1981), the Supreme Court held that pursuant to a lawfully executed warrant, the officers involved in searching a home have limited authority to detain the occupants during the search. The Supreme Court explained that such detention “is not likely to be exploited by the officer or unduly prolonged in order to gain more information, because the information the officers seek normally will be obtained through the search and not through the detention.” Id. at 701, 101 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. WidiDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- United States v. DaubmannDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- United States v. James WeissCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025