Legal Opinion

United States v. Mittel-Carey

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 20, 2006No. Criminal Action 05-10335-WGYPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692, 704-05, 101 S.Ct. 2587, 69 L.Ed.2d 340 (1981), the Supreme Court held that pursuant to a lawfully executed warrant, the officers involved in searching a home have limited authority to detain the occupants during the search. The Supreme Court explained that such detention “is not likely to be exploited by the officer or unduly prolonged in order to gain more information, because the information the officers seek normally will be obtained through the search and not through the detention.” Id. at 701, 101 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. United States v. WidiDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
  3. United States v. DaubmannDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  4. United States v. James WeissCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API