Legal Opinion
State v. LaCombe
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 2009No. 09-544PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.
| defendant, Cody LaCombe, appeals his jury conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, a violation of La. R.S. 14:68.4, on the basis of insufficiency of the evidence. The evidence is sufficient. We affirm.
LAW AND DISCUSSION
Defendant argues that while he may have been dilatory in his job performance, he did not possess the specific intent to take or use his employer’s vehicle without consent or by means of fraudulent conduct. He argues that the State failed to submit any evidence that his absence with the vehicle was anything more than taking longer than…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ArismeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. GilbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. MaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State of Louisiana Versus Shineda N. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Edward Garriet, IIILouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.