Legal Opinion

Tacker v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 28, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This is a controversy involving the proper interpretation of Section 12-A of Chapter 17257, Acts 1935, commonly known as the referendum provision of the 1935 Slot Machine Act. The court below denied the injunction sought by appellant to restarin the appellees, County Commissioners of Polk County, from printing upon November 3, 1936, general election ballots the special question of recall of slot machine licensing provided to be voted upon under Section 12-A, supra, in the event a petition of twenty per cent, of the “qualified electors” of any county should so pray.

The case is now before this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. GilchristSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Duval County v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Anderson v. Tower Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pearson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  2. Birmingham Gas Co. v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Floridians Against Exp. Gambling v. FlpfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Treadwell v. Town of Oak HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  5. City of Miami Beach v. HermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API