Legal Opinion
United States v. John Edward Richard
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1984No. 83-1903PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
John Edward Richard appeals from a restitution order against him issued under the Victim and Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579, 3580 (1982). 1 The Act provides inter alia that a court “shall impose an order of restitution to the extent ... the imposition of such order will not unduly complicate or prolong the sentencing process.” 18 U.S.C. § 3579(d). Richard argues that determining the proper amount for restitution is so complicated in this case that the district court should have sentenced him without a restitution order to avoid unduly complicating or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nina C. Neu v. Frank Grant and Lorna Marie Grant, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Gregory J. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Julius C. Immordino and Joanne Immordino, and Third-Party v. Joseph C. Costa, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Ronald v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Darlene G. BrucheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.