Legal Opinion

Noyes & Fish v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1889No. 2637PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Upshur. Tried below before Hon. Felix J. McCord. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HOBBY, Judge.

Whether the assignments are well taken depends, we think, upon the appellants’ right to intervene in the suit of W. H. Brown v. The E. & W. T. Lumber Company.

Brown, the appellee here, had in June, 1888, sued the E. & W. T. Lumber Company upon a note for $5000, and caused an attachment to be levied upon the property of that company, which it appears was placed in the hands of a receiver, who sold the property, retaining the proceeds thereof. In October, 1888, Noyes & Fish intervened in this suit, averring in their petition that Brown was indebted to them in the sum of $3388.50, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arthur v. BatteTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carter Bros. & Co. v. HightowerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cargill & Dennis v. Kountze Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stansell v. FlemingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Chapman v. LeavertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Gulf Nat. Bank v. BassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API