Legal Opinion

State v. Gasper

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 23, 2018No. 20160872-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

Judge David N. Mortensen authored this Opinion, in which Judges Kate A. Toomey and Ryan M. Harris concurred.

1Opinion of the Court

MORTENSEN, Judge:

¶1 Defendant Aaron Gasper hosted a house party in the summer of 2014. Following the party, a teenage guest accused Gasper of twice raping her during the course of the evening. The State charged Gasper with two counts of rape and sought to admit evidence under rule 404(b) of the Utah Rules of Evidence of a previous instance of alleged sexual assault involving Gasper. The district court admitted the evidence for the noncharacter purpose of intent and under the doctrine of chances. Gasper later pled guilty to second degree forcible sexual abuse, preserving his right to appeal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. ThorntonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. LuceroUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. ReeceUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Nelson-WaggonerUtah Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API