Kreider v. Yarosh
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MISER, C.
Appellant owns the west half of section n, township 102 north, range 68, in Brule county. Respondents are the county commissioners and1 the highway superintendent of said county. Appellant claiming that respondents were seeking to move a section line highway between said section II and section io to a location east of its former location where it would be entirely upon appellant’s land, obtained a temporary injunction. Respondents, *382in their answer and counterclaim, ask the court to determine the true and correct boundary line along the proposed road. They had already constructed the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Coulter v. GudehusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Lawson v. Viola TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christianson v. Daneville TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Lawson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Smith v. GasperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- McDonald v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929