Legal Opinion

350 Montana v. Haaland

District Court, D. Montana

Decided March 9, 2020No. 9:19-cv-00012Unknown

1Opinion

FILE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MAR 0 9 2020 MISSOULA DIVISION Clerk, U.S. District Court District Of Montana Miseoula 350 MONTANA, et al., CV 19-12-M-DWM Plaintiffs, VS. OPINION and ORDER DAVID BERNHARDT, et al., Defendants, and SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. Plaintiffs are environmental organizations challenging, once again, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement’s (“Enforcement Office”) approval of Signal Peak Energy, LLC’s application to expand the Bull Mountains Mine. The expansion was first approved in 2015 but was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API