Legal Opinion

Miske v. Fischer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1935No. 30,192PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Devaney, Chief Justice.

This is an election contest. The office involved is that of constable at large for the city of St. Paul, Minnesota. Contestee, Benedict G. Fischer, was declared duly elected, and contestant, Frank Miske, appellant herein, brings this action claiming that defendant violated that section of the corrupt practices act which provides that all matter published concerning a candidate at election tending to influence voting shall bear on the face thereof the address of the author and the person causing the same to be issued and circulated. 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 544.

It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawley v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Miller v. MaierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Exrieder v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Flaten v. KvaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Effertz v. SchimelpfenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API