Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. West

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1909No. 1548PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for malicious prosecution, from city court of Eloyd county — Judge Hamilton. October 6, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant caused him to be arrested upon a warrant charging him with the offense of “trespass;” that the defendant acted maliciously and without probable cause; that the plaintiff was carried before a magistrate and bound over to the city court, but in that court the prosecution terminated by the solicitor-general entering a nolle prosequi upon the accusation which had been drawn upon the commitment and warrant. The court sustained a general demurrer, and the plaintiff excepts. Two reasons are assigned by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ross v. HixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Perkins v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darnell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Luke v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Sykes v. South Side Atlanta BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Mansor v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Barwick v. Stevens Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API