Lafollette v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Cass Circuit Court. — Hon. N. M. Givan, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, C.
The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $195, from which defendant has appealed. We are precluded from consider*200ing the questions raised at the trial, for the reason that the record fails to contain any bill of exceptions.
•The record discloses an order and consent of parties that a bill of exceptions may be filed twenty days after adjournment of the term. There is nothing of record, or on what purports to be a bill of exceptions, to indicate that it was ever filed at all. There must be an entry of record to make a bill of exceptions a part of the record.…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Roush v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- State v. StamperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- State v. RolleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- State ex rel. Chester v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.