Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Petsch
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1958No. 5868PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant insurer seeks relief from a judgment entered after a jury verdict in a suit brought by appellees insureds to recover losses claimed to have been sustained by reason of insurer’s denial of liability under two insurance policies.
Early in 1954 an agent of the insurer discussed with the insureds a program of insurance for protection against liability arising from use of automobiles and from ranch operations. The agent suggested a policy which wduld protect against claims of injured employees and said that the insureds “would be protected up to One Hundred…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lumber Underwriters of NY v. RifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- C. E. Carnes & Co. v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd. of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Campbell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Yates v. American Republics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Fred PetschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958