Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Ontario v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1970No. L. A. 29677Published

1DissentBurke, J.

I dissent.

For the reasons set forth by Mr. Justice Tamura in the opinion prepared by him for the Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two, and concurred in by Presiding Justice McCabe and Justice Kerrigan (reported in (Cal.App.) 78 Cal.Rptr. 746),1 it is my opinion that *349this action is governed by sections 860 to 870 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that plaintiffs failed to show good cause for not complying with those sections. Accordingly, I would issue the peremptory writ of *350prohibition restraining respondent court from taking any further proceedings in the main action, other than…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maben v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Simmons v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Waters v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Glendale v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Cmty. Redevelopment Agency of L.A. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API