Legal Opinion
Anderson v. East Oregon Lumber Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions
From Wallowa: J. W. Knowles, Judge. In Banc.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
It is agreed by both parties that the defendant as part of the first part and the plaintiff and five others as parties of the second part executed a written contract of which the following is a copy:
“This agreement, made and entered into in duplicate this 1st day of February, 1921, wherein East *461Oregon Lumber Company is party of the first part, and Daniel Sword, G-. S. Anderson, Ole Holland, Emil Edwardson, Pete Burreson and Ole Bnrreson are parties of the second part,
“Witnesseth: That the consideration of this agreement is the mutual covenants entered into and agreed to by the parties of this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eastman v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1828
- Clark v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1830
- Wiggin v. TudorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1839
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
- McGINNIS v. KeenOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- McInnis v. Atlantic Investment Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Sword v. East Oregon Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922