Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Patterson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

PROM KNOX. . Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. H. R. Gibson, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Complainant and defendant were married in Knoxville, on the' twentieth of January, 1889, and, on the twenty-fifth of March following, this bill was filed by the wife ' for divorce and alimony. Answer and cross-bill were filed by the husband, and answer to the cross-bill by the wife;

The cause was heard by the Chancellor on the pleadings, proof on file, and testimony of witnesses examined in open Court, and decree was pronounced granting the wife divorce a vinculo and alimony.

The defendant has appealed, and here insists that the decree is not warranted by the evidence.

Complainant’s counsel…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Dunn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hinton v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Bettis v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Rhinehart v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API