Legal Opinion

C. T. Willard Co. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1913Published

Action by the C. T. Willard Company against the City of New York and others to foreclose liens under public improvement contracts. Decision suspended for want of proper parties.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The action is to foreclose a lien claimed to have been acquired under a contract in writing dated on or about August 27, 1909, for a public improvement, entered into by the Robertson & Gerehart Contracting Company with the city of New York for the regulating, grading, and paving with macadam pavement Bay Ridge Parkway (extension of Shore Road), between Fourth avenue and Ft. Hamilton avenue, in the borough of Brooklyn, city and state of New York. The said Robertson & Gerehart Contracting Company also entered into other contracts with the city which are designated in the evidence and briefs as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. LakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. City Equity Co. v. Elm Park Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Quinlan v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API