Cheeves v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of the crime of receiving stolen property, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.
It is first contended that the information is insufficient to charge the offense. No demurrer was filed to this information and no objection made to the introduction of evidence thereunder. The information is in the usual form, and was sufficient to charge the offense.
It is next contended that the court erred in refusing to give defendant’s requested instruction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Key v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Logan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. LimaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944