Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Whitman v. Indust Comm

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1936No. 2638Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

The facts stated arc made the subject matter of the petition in mandamus and it is the claim of the relator that the Commission should be required to make an additional award under the constitutional provision. The respondent files a general demurrer to the petition and thus there is presented the question whether or not the petition states a cause of action. The proposition is determined by the proper construction of §1465-61, GC, under which the original award was made to the relator by the Commission, and of Article 2, Paragraph 35 of the Constitution of Ohio.

Sec…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lane Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API