Legal Opinion

Angelina M. Fuller v. Hyundai Motor Group Metaplant, America

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided January 23, 2026No. 4:25-cv-00019Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION ANGELINA M. FULLER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:25-cv-019 v. HYUNDAI MOTOR GROUP METAPLANT, AMERICA, Defendant. O RDE R Pro se Plaintiff Angelina M. Fuller sued Defendant Hyundai Motor Group Metaplant, America (“HMGMA”) 1 under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000, et seq. (“Title VII”), and under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. (“ADEA”), alleging that she was discriminated against because of her sex, gender, and age. (Doc. 1.) Presently…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Travaglio v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API