Legal Opinion

Flint v. Kennedy

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 13, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

At Law; On motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtShipman, J.

This is a motion by the defendant for a new trial of an action at law upon the ground of the improper admission of testimony. The action was to recover the sum claimed to be due from the defendant for a large quantity of goods and merchandise, consisting mainly of furniture, which had been delivered to him by the plaintiffs. The defense was that the amount for which the goods were contracted to be furnished had been substantially paid. The point in dispute was whether the wood-work in certain rooms upon the first floor of the defendant’s house was included in the original and verbal contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oregon Steamship Co. v. . OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Prople v. Le RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Paige v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. State ex rel. Meeker v. McGlothlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. North Hudson County Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API