Legal Opinion

Pittsburg, S. & W. R. v. Fiske

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 3, 1903No. 33PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

DALEAS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree awarding an injunction restraining the plaintiffs in error “from interfering with, or in any manner obstructing the use of, the switch in controversy.” This switch, and the land upon which it was laid, were in possession of the plaintiff below, under at least a prima facie title, when the defendants, without license or authority of law, placed an engine and cars upon it, and so prevented the plaintiff .from using it as he desired to do. This was a trespass, and the act of the injured party in repelling it, by removing, with such force as…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Newfound Management Corporation v. Cedrick LewisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Denver & R. G. R. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. Pittsburgh, S. & N. R. v. FiskeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  4. Slaughter v. Mallet Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
  5. Mathis v. StrunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API