Legal Opinion
California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 2004No. 02-73093PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
383 F.3d 1006
State of CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Petitioner,
Coral Power, LLC; Duke Energy North America, LLC; Duke Energy Trading And Marketing, LLC; Transcanada Energy Ltd.; City of Tacoma, Washington; Portland General Electric Company; Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.; El Segundo Power LLC, Long Beach Generation LLC; Cabrillo Power I LLC; Cabrillo Power II LLC; Mirant Americas Energy Marketing LP; Mirant California, LLC; Mirant Delta, LLC; Mirant Potrero, LLC; Public Service Company of New Mexico; El Paso Merchant Energy LP; BP Energy Co.; Public Service Company of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Enron Corp. v. California Ex Rel. Lockyer (In Re Enron Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Anti.District Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- Team Design v. Reliant Energy, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2004