Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Hennochsberg

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided April 16, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, District Judge.

One Gruber was engaged in the tailoring business at *605Memphis, Tenn. Being financially embarrassed, he applied to the hank at which defendant, Hennoehsberg, was employed for a loan of $500. The collateral offered by Gruber was not such as could he accepted by the bank, but the loan was made hy Hennoehsberg personally. As security for the loan Gruber assigned to him certain accounts due him from customers. ' The accounts were examined by liennoehsborg prior to assignment, and the assignment was evidenced by a notation made on the hooks of Gruber by stamping’ thereon with a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ernst v. Mechanics' & Metals Nat. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  2. Carey v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Clark v. IselinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Greey v. DockendorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Waldschmidt v. Ranier (In Re Fulghum Construction Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
  2. Quinn v. Union Nat. Bank of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  3. In Re Pusey-Maynes-Breish Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Dickenson v. Third National Bank (In re Yates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
  5. Raul Uvalles v. Rueter, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API