Israel v. Champion Shoe Machinery Co.

The question before the court is whether the motion .of -the defendant to quash the service of summons should be granted. The answer to this question depends upon whether Roy A. Westfall, the person upon whom summons was served, was a “managing agent” within the meaning of. Section 11290 G-.. C. This section provides:

*508“When the defendant is a foreign corporation, having a managing agent in this state, the service may be upon such agent/’

In the original return Roy A. Westfall was described as the “mechanical representative” of defendant. Upon motion, this court quashed this service as not being…