Canning v. Canning
Supreme Court of Vermont
Petition for divorce. Heard at the March Term, 1913, Washington County, Fish J., presiding, on petitionee’s demurrer to petitioner’s replication. Demurrer overruled and replication adjudged sufficient, to which the petitionee excepted. Case passed to the Supreme Court before hearing on merits. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is a petition for divorce from bed and board. The petitionee pleaded in bar articles of separation. To this plea the petitioner replied that the cause alleged in his petition was unknown to him at the time of the execution of the separation agreement. To the replication the petitionee demurred. The court below overruled the demurrer and adjudged the replication a sufficient answer to the plea and that the petitioner might maintain his petition for divorce, to which the petitionee was allowed an exception and the cause passed to this Court before final hearing.
The plea alleges, in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Clark, Trustee, Etc. v. . FosdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- J. G. v. H. G.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Franklin v. FranklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cleary v. LafranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938