Wilkinson v. Conaty
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Washtenaw. (Joslin, J.) Bill for an accounting, and to declare land previously-deeded and mortgage assigned to be assets, to be disposed of for the payment of debts, etc. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
On the fourth of April, 1878, Rose Conaty, who then resided in Washtenaw county, Michigan, was the owner in fee of certain lands in that county, described as lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, and the west part of lot 32, in block 1 of the original plat of the village of Chelsea; also lot 61 of block 4 according to said plat; and lot 17 of block 5 of James M. Congdon’s second addition to the village of Chelsea.
In 1867 she executed to Bichard Alehin her promissory, *616note, secured by mortgage, for $1,000, with annual interest at 10 per cent., payable as therein specified.
On October 6, 1877, she obtained…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gillett v. NeedhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Shipman v. ButterfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sprague v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Harrison v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Johnson v. ArmstrongUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re Cloward's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re Marxhausen's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.