State v. Lynch
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Cornelius Lynch ("Lynch"), brings this appeal challenging his convictions for rape and kidnapping. Specifically, Lynch argues that the trial court erred by denying his motions to dismiss the indictment based on preindictment delay, the state engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, and that the charges should have been dismissed based on double jeopardy grounds. After a thorough review of the record and law, this court affirms.
I. Factual and Procedural History
{¶ 2} The instant appeal arose…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ClippsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. PinneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2025