Legal Opinion

State v. Lynch

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2018No. 105122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Cornelius Lynch ("Lynch"), brings this appeal challenging his convictions for rape and kidnapping. Specifically, Lynch argues that the trial court erred by denying his motions to dismiss the indictment based on preindictment delay, the state engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, and that the charges should have been dismissed based on double jeopardy grounds. After a thorough review of the record and law, this court affirms.

I. Factual and Procedural History

{¶ 2} The instant appeal arose…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ClippsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. PinneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API