Legal Opinion
Dedvukaj v. Madonado
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided April 22, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Klein, J.
Respondent’s motion is decided as follows:
The action is restored to the calendar of May 24,1982 for a hearing and trial at which time a determination will be made as to whether or not the demands for any rentals accruing from May, 1980 through October, 1981 are stale pursuant to the guidelines herein set forth. The proceeding for collection of any rent determined to be stale will be an action at law for money only, and all counterclaims by the respondent for said period will be dismissed pursuant to respondent’s motion.
*212The doctrine of “stale rent” has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Antillean Holding Co. v. LindleyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Gramford Realty Corp. v. ValentinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Maxwell v. E. SimonsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- City of New York v. BetancourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
- City of New York v. BetancourtCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zenila Realty Corp. v. MasterandreaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- DeWeerth v. BaldingerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Marriott v. ShawCivil Court of the City of New York · 1991
- Greenburger v. LearyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983