Legal Opinion

Padilla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 22, 2005No. 3D05-424PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

Upon consideration of the defendant’s motion for rehearing, we deny the motion. The defendant argues that the calculation of his sentencing guideline scoresheet violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it includes points for victim injury, which raised his sentence beyond the statutory maximum, and the victim injury finding was not submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Because the defendant did not raise this issue in his motion to correct illegal sentence below, nor in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Campbell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API