Eason v. Highley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hast, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). It is the settled law of this State that where an estate comes to an intestate by gift or devise, without consideration other than that of blood, it is an ancestral estate; but that, if any part of the consideration is a valuable one, the estate acquired is a new acquisition. The court has held frequently that the purpose of the statute creating ancestral estates was to keep such estates in the line oif1 blood from which they came, and that blood must be the only consideration by which they are acquired, whether by devise or gift. Hence, if an estate is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Campbell v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
- Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Hill v. HeardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Earl v. EarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chaffin v. CrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Webb v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939