Legal Opinion

Reed v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 23, 2009No. 07-2505Published

1Dissent 1

DISSENT

2Dissent · McKEAGUEMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge

The majority opinion affirms based on Reed’s failure to demonstrate either discharge or discipline as part of his prima facie case against his union — a union, it is worth noting, that does not have the power to discharge or to discipline. I do not think either Title VII or our past holdings requires such a showing. An adverse employment action should be all that is required to establish a prima facie case for a religious accommodation claim, and certainly no more than that should be required in a claim against a union. The UAW required Reed to pay more dues because of the religious…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API