Quinn v. PERU TRANSIT LINES, INC.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, P. J.
This is an appeal from the Fulton Circuit Court arising out of a personal injury accident wherein the appellant here was the plaintiff below. The verdict of the jury was for the defendants. The court rendered consistent judgment.
The issues formed by the plaintiff’s second amended complaint and the defendants’ answer, under Rule 1-3, charged the defendants with negligence and resulting injury to the plaintiff who was a passenger in defendants’ taxicab. The appellant filed a motion for a new trial specifying five grounds in substance as follows:
1. The verdict was contrary to law;
2. Error of law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Asc Corporation v. First Nat. Bank, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1960
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. KnollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- O'NEAL v. DevenyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lindenborg v. M & L Builders and Brokers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Loudermilk v. Feld Truck Leasing Co. of Ind.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Abbett v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Kruss v. Sink & Edwards, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970