Beck v. City of Waterville
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WEBBER, Justice.
After jury verdict for the plaintiffs, defendant appealed from the judgment. Among the stated points of appeal is the assertion of error with respect to the denial of defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. The decisive issue here is whether or not any enforceable contract was entered into by the parties. As is required in such circumstances we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs.
The defendant city in June, 1960 recognized the necessity of constructing a new high school building. As a means of implementing the program, the Board of Aider-men and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Looman Realty Corp. v. BROAD ST. NAT. BK., TRENTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Vinal v. Inhabitants of NahantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Benton v. Springfield Young Men's Christian Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- City of Baltimore v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- Van Buren Light & Power Co. v. Inhabitants of Van BurenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Waterville v. Bartell Telephone TV SystemsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967