Legal Opinion

De Maria v. Potamkin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 1996No. 96-891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHEVIN, Judge.

Suzanne De Maria [De Maria] appeals a final judgment finding her personally liable on a promissory note. We affirm.

In 1990, Alan H. Potamkin loaned The Classic Touch, Inc., $200,000. Potamkin was assured by De Maria’s husband, Joseph De Maria, that De Maria would personally guarantee the indebtedness. Potamkin’s business practice was to extend loans only in exchange for personal guarantees. De Maria signed a promissory note, prepared by The Classic Touch, Inc’s corporate secretary, for the loan amount; the corporation’s name was typed under her signature.1 There is no indication…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Speer v. FriedlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Ross v. BandiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. S. Kornreich & Sons v. Titan Agencies, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Serna v. Milanese, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Hind-Marsh v. PugliaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berti v. Cedars Healthcare Group, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API