Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1975No. Proceeding No. 1; Proceeding No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Complainant Bettine Hayes filed a complaint on May 4, 1973, with the State Division of Human Rights to the effect that she had been discharged by her employer, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, discriminatorily because of her age and sex, in violation of article 15 of the Executive Law. Two individual management employees were also joined as parties respondent; they were eliminated as parties in later development of the case. Hayes, employed 22 years, had held lesser positions but was a senior portfolio analyst when discharged. Probable cause having been found on investigation, formal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holland v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Mize v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  2. Blake v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API