Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Curtis Pub. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 4, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first, third and fourth defenses is denied. Even if plaintiff had not withdrawn so much of his motion as relates to the first defense, I still think it is entirely unnecessary to plead such a defense that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendants say that they believe it is necessary to set it out in their answer because of Rule 12(b) (g) (h), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, contending that if not pleaded, it is waived. The failure of a complaint to state a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dart Drug Corp. v. Corning Glass WorksDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
  2. Peterson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Watts-Wagner Co. v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  4. Sorin v. BOARD OF ED., ETC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
  5. Albachten v. CorbettDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API