Legal Opinion

Bay Co. v. Renegotiation Board

United States Tax Court

Decided July 30, 1962No. Docket No. 952-RPublished

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1952, petitioner (maintaining a completed contract basis of accounting) completed four contracts subject to renegotiation totaling $ 1,998,933.40. Overhead expenses during the years such contracts were in process were allocated to such contracts on petitioner's books on the basis of their direct costs.

Read the full summary

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1952, petitioner (maintaining a completed contract basis of accounting) completed four contracts subject to renegotiation totaling $ 1,998,933.40. Overhead expenses during the years such contracts were in process were allocated to such contracts on petitioner's books on the basis of their direct costs. Under such overhead allocation method, the profit, per books, on such contracts was $ 346,246.52. Held, petitioner employed a method of allocating overhead on its books and records which properly reflected its costs on the contracts. Held, further,…

1Opinion of the Court

The Bay Company, Petitioner, v. Renegotiation Board, Respondent

Bay Co. v. Renegotiation Board

Docket No. 952-R

United States Tax Court

38 T.C. 535; 1962 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 108;

July 30, 1962, Filed

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1952, petitioner (maintaining a completed contract basis of accounting) completed four contracts subject to renegotiation totaling $ 1,998,933.40. Overhead expenses during the years such contracts were in process were allocated to such contracts on petitioner's books on the basis of their direct costs. Under such overhead allocation method, the profit, per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Secretary of WarUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  2. Bay Co. v. Renegotiation BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. Stoner Manufacturing Corp. v. Secretary of WarUnited States Tax Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API