Davidson v. Equitable Life
New York Supreme Court
. Action by one Davidson against the Equitable Life, etc., Society.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoee, J.
There can be no question that the issues tendered by the defendant’s answer in support of the affirmative defense should be tried before a referee, rather than before a jury. Some 90 and more items of an account are to be involved in actual dispute, and it is obvious that the controversy cannot be intelligently determined upon a jury trial. Unless some technical rule stands in the way, therefore the more' appropriate form of trial before a referee should be ordered, and, as this case is presented the motion is clearly within the power of the court to grant.
The rule that, where the complaint…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Irving v. IrvingNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- National Shoe & Leather Bank v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- National Shoe & Leather Bank v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Fisher v. HainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901