Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Mappin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 8, 1979No. 57179Published

1Opinion of the Court

149 Ga. App. 847 (1979)

256 S.E.2d 135

TUCKER

v.

MAPPIN.

57179.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Submitted February 12, 1979.

Decided May 8, 1979.

Hubert E. Hamilton, III, for appellant.

Kendrick-Holmes, Slocumb & Pinkston, Robert S. Slocumb, for appellee.

SHULMAN, Judge.

Appellant-Tucker, on behalf of his minor son, brought suit against appellee-Mappin, under the family purpose doctrine, for injuries his son sustained while riding as a guest passenger in defendant's car. From a jury verdict for the defendant, plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

1. One of the issues in contention was the identity of the driver of…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Deen; Concurrence · McMURRAY.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Hardwick v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Week v. Big Bunker Hill Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Grasham v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API