Legal Opinion

Naglak v. Dairy Treat Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Paragraphs “3”, “6” and “16” of the demand should have been modified rather than vacated in their entirety, as defendant is entitled to be informed as to the particulars of his alleged prevention of plaintiff’s performance and the particulars of plaintiff’s tender of performance and to be furnished with an itemized statement of the damages claimed; and the order appealed from is modified accordingly and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The other demands vacated were in most eases improper and in all eases so involved and diffuse as to render compliance unduly burdensome and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosini v. CunananAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API