Legal Opinion
Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 19, 1993No. Civ. A. 90-11662-KPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEETON, District Judge.
On July 31, 1992, the court allowed, in part, a motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiff Lotus Development Corporation (“Lotus”) and denied the cross motion for summary judgment by defendant Borland International, Incorporated (“Borland”). After extended procedural maneuvering, the parties agreed to try remaining liability issues without a jury. An explanation of the proceedings leading up to the trial is essential to precise identification of the issues raised by the parties in the nonjury trial of February 1-3 and March 31 — April 2, 1993.
I. Earlier…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Concrete MacHinery Company, Inc. v. Classic Lawn Ornaments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Georgia Lee Miller Roulo, Cross-Appellant v. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Russell v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Engineering Dynamics, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Structural Software, Inc., and S. Rao Guntur, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Danjaq Llc v. Sony CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.