Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Dunning

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1995No. S-6373PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2 ORDER

On consideration of appellant’s motion for clarification, filed on August 28, 1995,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The motion for clarification is GRANTED.

2. Opinion No. 4237, published on August 18, 1995, is WITHDRAWN.

3. Opinion No. 4278 is issued on this date in its place. The opinion is modified at page 2, line 5 with the addition of a new footnote which will be keyed to “Superior Court Judge pro tem.” This new footnote will read as follows:

1. We agree with Judge Wood’s opinion in all respects except for his use of “jurisdiction” and “statutory jurisdiction” in Sections III.B. and IV. of his…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sonneman v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Westberry v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. Ralston v. State, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. WallAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State, Child Support Enforcement Division v. BromleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. East v. PNC Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  3. Serrano v. Los Alamos NTLNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API