Moody v. Boston & Maine Railroad

[After the foregoing statement of the case.] 1. As to the first exception: What the plaintiff complains of in his argument is not what he put forward as his objection to this *280part of the charge. What the plaintiff has argued is that the jury were told that in furnishing proper egress from the car on which a passenger is carried the carrier is not bound to use the highest degree of care, but ordinary care only. The part of the charge objected to by the plaintiff was “ that if the defendant provides safe means of egress and a safe and convenient place to alight, that fulfils the duty imposed by…