Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jackson v. Lindsay

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1911No. 17,084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court.

1Per curiam

The defendant, Lindsay, appeals from a judgment assessing a fine for contempt in violating the injunction reviewed in The State v. Lindsay, ante, p. 79. The errors complained of relate to the admission of testimony and its sufficiency, and to the judgment.

A witness residing in the vicinity of the cottages, referred to in the opinion in the case just cited, testi*193fied that he heard a woman screaming so loud that it awakened him, and that it continued for ten minutes, “a very high, screaming note. It was very grating on one’s nerves. ... It was a cry such as would startle you.” Four days…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. State v. HetrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Sun Insurance Office v. Western Woolen-mill Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Townsdin v. NuttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  5. Bice v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Peoples Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Anthony Frisone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Gilbreath v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Small v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API