Legal Opinion

United States v. 168.8 Acres of Land

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1940No. Civ. No. 16RPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

On the 12th day of September this court after a hearing granted to all parties claiming any interest in the fund of the 86 acres acquired by the United States in this proceeding, decided that M. H. Gardner was entitled to the entire amount of the proceeds which should be applied as a credit on the judgment of the Standard Fertilizer Co. v. Percy L. Gardner and that none of the other parties were entitled to any part of the said proceeds.

*725The Bank of Pinehurst was a party to that proceeding and participated in that hearing. On the 23rd day of September, . 1939, the Bank of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wallace v. . BennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Lynch v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Southerland v. . FremontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Lynch v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Security Trust Co. of Freeport v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lumbard v. Maglia, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Taylor v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Home Savings & Loan Co. v. O'Reilly (In Re O'Reilly)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API