United States v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDever, District Judge
I agree with the majority that the district court violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment at trial in accepting the stipulation that the package seized at the Louisville airport contained 98.61 grams of heroin. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s conclusion that the error requires a new trial. Notably, the stipulation did not connect Williams to the seized package or inculpate Williams in the charged conspiracy in any *135way. Having reviewed the record in light of Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999), Delaware v. Van Arsdall,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.