Stewart v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue presented for review is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict of guilty.
There is no serious dispute that the evidence adduced at this trial, circumstantial or otherwise, demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that a burglary and attempted theft had taken place at the Liberty Pharmacy in the early hours of January 2, 1975. What the defendant does dispute in this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to permit the jury to conclude that he perpetrated these crimes.
The evidence upon which the jury made this determination was for the most part…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peters v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Henry JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- State v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- United States v. Jordan M. ScherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Murphy v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Donald Lee Jentges v. Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Honorable Harold B. Jackson, Jr., Presiding and the Attorney General of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- State v. AllbaughCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.