Legal Opinion

Church v. John Davis & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892Published

Error to Wayne. (Brevóort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff is a traveling salesman, and, prior to the year 1888, had been in the employ of defendant for several years. The parties had a disagreement in 1887, and the plaintiff left defendant’s employ. About the 1st of January, 1888, he was re-engaged, and continued to work for defendant during the year 1888. This action is brought to recover a balance of $300, ■claimed to be due him. Dnder the agreement for re-employment, his right depended upon the question of what the terms of this agreement were. The plaintiff testified that the defendant agreed to pay him $100 per month and expenses,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lyon v. ChamberlainMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API